+~
+Not only are there two different categories of phenomena, the person and the
+external phenomena, there are also two different types of misconceptions with
+respect to the nature of phenomena: misconceptions with respect to the nature
+of the person and with respect to the external phenomena. This means to
+overcome these two types of misconception is to realize selflessness, which is
+the ultimate nature of these two types of phenomena. Therefore there are two
+selflessnesses, selflessness of person and selflessness of phenomena.
+Generally speaking, comparing the two, the realization of the selflessness of
+the person is said to be easier than realization of the selflessness of
+phenomena because of long familiarity with the actual self, the person.
+ -- H.H. the Fourteenth Dalai Lama, "Gentle Bridges: Conversations with the
+ Dalai Lama on the Sciences of Mind", edited by Jeremy Hayward and
+ Francisco J. Varela, published by Shambhala Publications
+~
+The Tibetan term for renunciation is ngepar jungwa; nges par ’byung ba,
+which literally means "certainty of release." Ngepar is short for ngepar
+shepa, meaning to have certain, decisive knowledge from within; in this case,
+it refers to having certainty that the nature of worldly existence is
+suffering. In addition to this certainty, there is the heartfelt wish to be
+released, jungwa, from this suffering. One must gain confidence in the fact
+that the nature of cyclic existence in samsara is suffering, together with
+having the powerful wish and intention to be free of this suffering. This is
+what is known as the thought of renunciation.
+ -- Nyoshul Khenpo, "The Fearless Lion’s Roar: Profound Instructions on
+ Dzogchen, the Great Perfection", published by Shambhala Publications
+~
+“Karma” basically means action. When we talk about karma, we talk about
+action, which in Buddhism entails thinking in terms of cause and effect.
+Actions are performed because there are certain preexisting causes and
+conditions giving rise to the impulse to engage in particular actions, and
+from this the karmic effect issues. In the performance of actions, there is
+usually a propelling factor. We feel compelled by something to do certain
+things, and when we engage in those actions, based on those impulses, the
+actions then produce relevant effects. As we have seen though, this does not
+mean that every action performed has a particular cause and a particular
+effect. Nevertheless, the Buddhist theory of karma is irrevocably tied to
+this mechanism, for want of a better word, and hence to the responsibility of
+the individual, as opposed to a divine governance of sorts.
+ -- Traleg Kyabgon, "Karma: What It Is, What It Isn't, Why It Matters",
+ published by Shambhala Publications