rely on such consciousness.
-- Jamgön Kongtrül Lodro Taye, from "The Treasury of Knowledge: Book Seven
and Book Eight, Parts One and Two"
+~
+ Such is the process of karma: it is ineluctable; its results are greatly
+magnified; actions not committed have no effect; and the effects of actions
+committed never expire on their own.
+ Generally speaking, whether you are an ordinary mortal individual or a
+spiritually advanced being, all positive experiences that carry with them any
+pleasant sensation—down to even the slightest pleasure caused by a cool
+breeze for beings reborn in a hell realm—occur due to positive karma
+reinforced in the past; it is not in accord with the nature of things that
+happiness be due to negative karma. And all negative experiences that carry
+with them any unpleasant sensation—down to even the slightest suffering that
+could occur in the experience of an arhat—occur due to negative karma one
+has reinforced in the past; for it is not in accord with the nature of things
+that suffering be due to positive karma.
+ -- Jamgön Kongtrül Lodro Taye, from "The Treasury of Knowledge: Book Seven
+ and Book Eight, Parts One and Two"
+~
+ "That which is seen and that which is touched are of a dream-like and
+ illusion-like nature. Because feeling arises together with the mind,
+ it is not [ultimately] perceived." --Shantideva
+
+ There is nothing whatever that has a true mode of existence. Nevertheless,
+this does not suggest that a person who experiences feelings and the feelings
+themselves—pleasant and unpleasant—are utterly non-existent. They do
+exist, but in an untrue fashion. Thus, the things that we see and touch have
+a dream-like and illusion-like quality.
+ In the second line the author refutes the true existence of the mind that
+experiences feelings. Since feelings arise in conjunction with the mind,
+feelings are not perceived by the mind that is simultaneous with them. There
+must be a causal relationship between the experienced object and the
+experiencing subject. If two entities are substantially distinct and exist
+simultaneously, there could be neither a causal relationship nor an identity
+relationship between them.
+ For this reason the author denies that either [intrinsic] relationship could
+hold for the feelings and the awareness that is simultaneous with them. Two
+mental events that arise in conjunction with each other are not able to
+apprehend one another. This holds true for all states of awareness. Thus,
+feelings are not observed by the awareness that arises in conjunction with
+them and that exists simultaneously with them.
+ -- H.H. the Dalai Lama