X-Git-Url: https://feistymeow.org/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=database%2Ffortunes.dat;h=e56625ae0a913b3b5bfd4d4790cbb5e0203a814f;hb=e715c6598343dd15a8652cd22923c4e48aaf1aef;hp=7b6eb6a6d03d9e8cb22c246f13b15713ee2ee9e3;hpb=20d7020a6aa477b3b0b6d1b7465fe65803bc4ccb;p=feisty_meow.git diff --git a/database/fortunes.dat b/database/fortunes.dat index 7b6eb6a6..e56625ae 100644 --- a/database/fortunes.dat +++ b/database/fortunes.dat @@ -38039,3 +38039,146 @@ strong generation of desire or hatred appears to you to be just senseless. Gradually, such a bias weakens, and you decide that one-sided classification of persons as friends and enemies has been a mistake. -- H.H. the Dalai Lama +~ + Generally speaking, even if money brings us happiness, it tends to be the +kind that money can buy: material things and sensory experiences. And these, +we discover, become a source of suffering themselves. As far as actual +possessions are concerned, we must admit that they often cause us more, not +less, difficulty in life. The car breaks down, we lose our money, our most +precious belongings are stolen, our house is damaged by fire. Or we worry +about these things happening. + The problem is not materialism as such. Rather it is the underlying +assumption that full satisfaction can arise from gratifying the senses alone. +Unlike animals whose quest for happiness is restricted to survival and to the +immediate gratification of sensory desires, we human beings have the capacity +to experience happiness at a deeper level, which, when achieved, can overwhelm +unhappy experiences. + -- H.H. the Dalai Lama +~ +We humans are social beings. We come into the world as the result of +others' actions. We survive here in dependence on others. Whether we like +it or not, there is hardly a moment of our lives in which we do not benefit +from others' activities. For this reason it is hardly surprising that most +of our happiness arises in the context of our relationships with others. Nor +is it so remarkable that our greatest joy should come when we are motivated by +concern for others. But that is not all. We find that not only do altruistic +actions bring about happiness, but they also lessen our experience of +suffering. Here I am not suggesting that the individual whose actions are +motivated by the wish to bring others happiness necessarily meets with less +misfortune than the one who does not. Sickness, old age, mishaps of one sort +or another are the same for us all. But the sufferings which undermine our +internal peace—anxiety, doubt, disappointment—these are definitely less. + -- H.H. the Dalai Lama +~ +If we view the world’s religions from the widest possible viewpoint and +examine their ultimate goal, we find that all of the major world religions, +whether Christianity or Islam, Hinduism or Buddhism, are dedicated to the +achievement of permanent human happiness. They are all directed toward that +goal. All religions emphasize the fact that the true follower must be honest +and gentle, in other words, that a truly religious person must always strive +to be a better human being. To this end, the different world religions teach +different doctrines which will help transform the person. In this regard, all +religions are the same, there is no conflict. This is something we must +emphasize. We must consider the question of religious diversity from this +viewpoint. And when we do, we find no conflict. + -- H.H. the Dalai Lama +~ +Emptiness vs. Non-Existence + +The doctrines of emptiness and selflessness do not imply the non-existence of +things. Things do exist. When we say that all phenomena are void of self- +existence, it does not mean that we are advocating non-existence, that we are +repudiating that things exist. Then what is it we are negating? We are +negating, or denying, that anything exists from its own side without depending +on other things. Hence, it is because things depend for their existence upon +other causes and conditions that they are said to lack independent self- +existence. + -- H.H. the Dalai Lama +~ +If we view the world’s religions from the widest possible viewpoint and +examine their ultimate goal, we find that all of the major world religions, +whether Christianity or Islam, Hinduism or Buddhism, are dedicated to the +achievement of permanent human happiness. They are all directed toward that +goal. All religions emphasize the fact that the true follower must be honest +and gentle, in other words, that a truly religious person must always strive +to be a better human being. To this end, the different world religions teach +different doctrines which will help transform the person. In this regard, all +religions are the same, there is no conflict. This is something we must +emphasize. We must consider the question of religious diversity from this +viewpoint. And when we do, we find no conflict. + -- H.H. the Dalai Lama +~ + The process of overcoming our defilements goes in conjunction with gaining +higher levels of realisation. In fact, when we speak of gaining higher levels +of realisation in Buddhism we are speaking primarily of the processes through +which our wisdom and insight deepen. It is actually the wisdom aspect that +enables the practitioner to move from one level to the next on the path. + The attainment of the levels of the path is explained in condensed form in +the Heart Sutra, where we find the mantra tadyatha om gate gate paragate +parasamgate bodhi svaha. Tadyatha means It is thus; gate gate means go, go; +paragate means go beyond and transcend; parasamgate means go utterly beyond, +go thoroughly beyond; and bodhi svaha means firmly rooted in enlightenment. + -- H.H. the Dalai Lama +~ +ENDURING SUCCESS + It is often seen that human beings can endure problems quite well, but +cannot endure success. When we are successful and have everything we desire, +it can easily go to our heads. There is a great danger of losing our common +sense and becoming careless and arrogant. As it is said, "Nothing corrupts a +person more than power." Very powerful people sometimes become so proud that +they no longer care about their actions or about the effect they have on +others. Losing any sense of right and wrong, they create severe problems for +themselves and everyone else. + Even if we have all the success we could dream of—fame, wealth, and so +on—we must understand that these things have no real substance. Attachment +does not come from having things, but from the way our mind reacts to them. +It is fine to participate in good circumstances, provided we can see that they +have no real essence. They may come and they may go. When seeing this, we +will not become so attached. Even if we lose our wealth we will not be badly +affected, and while it is there we will enjoy it without being senseless and +arrogant. + -- Ringu Tulku, from "Daring Steps: Traversing the Path of the Buddha", + edited and translated by Rosemarie Fuchs, page 92. +~ +The role of other sentient beings + + In relation to the attainment of liberation from cylic existence, which is +known also as "definite goodness," the role of other sentient beings is +indispensable. In the Buddhist understanding, the key spiritual practices +that lead to the attainment of liberation are the Three Higher +Trainings—higher training in morality, in meditation, and in wisdom. The +last two are based upon the foundation of the first, namely the training in +morality. As I said before, the presence of other sentience beings is +indispensable for this training. This is how we come to the powerful +realisation that the role of other sentient beings is essential in all areas +of our mundane and spiritual activities. + -- H.H. the Dalai Lama +~ + To avoid being hurt by thorns and brambles, we might consider covering all +the mountains with leather. That would be impossible, but putting on shoes +would serve the same purpose. Similarly, if we tried to subdue all our outer +enemies, we would never succeed. Once one was eliminated, another would rise +against us. While doing this, our anger would continue to breed new foes. +The only way to overcome our enemies is to turn inward and kill the real one, +which is our own hatred. + -- Ringu Tulku, from "Daring Steps: Traversing the Path of the Buddha", + edited and translated by Rosemarie Fuchs. +~ + One should not view one’s dharma practice as being something decorative, +regarding statues and images as material possessions or as furnishings for +one’s house, or thinking that because there is an empty space on a wall one +might as well put up a thangka for decoration. That kind of attitude should +not be cultivated. When you arrange the statues or thangkas, you should do so +out of a deep respect from the mind, moved by your faith and conviction. If +you can arrange these physical representations—statues and so forth—out of +deep respect and faith, that’s all right. On the other hand, the attitude +that they are merely material possessions is dangerous and destructive. I +think that some people who have a cupboard or the like in which they keep all +their precious possessions may arrange an altar on it just for the sake of +decoration. This is very wrong. + Having such motivations is not the proper way to become a Buddhist; the +proper way to become a Buddhist is to bring about some positive change within +the mind. Any practice that can give you more courage when you are undergoing +a very difficult time and that can provide you with some kind of solace and +calmness of mind is a true practice of the dharma. + -- H.H. the Dalai Lama