a quality that certainly can be nurtured.
-- Ezra Bayda, from "Beyond Happiness: The Zen Way to True Contentment",
published by Shambhala Publications
+~
+In the Great Perfection (Dzogchen) teachings, the issue is always whether or
+not we recognize our true nature and understand that the reflections of that
+nature manifest as experience. The dream is a reflection of our own mind.
+This is easy to believe after we wake up, just as the Buddhas know—after
+they are enlightened—that the entities and objects of samsara are illusory.
+And just as it takes practice to recognize the illusory nature of dream while
+asleep, we must practice to realize the illusory nature of waking life.
+
+ -- Tenzin Wangyal Rinpoche, "The Tibetan Yogas of Dream and Sleep",
+published by Shambhala Publications
+
+~
+ The jewel in the lotus is a wonderful metaphor for the essential nature of
+mind. It integrates two very different approaches, recognizing that there is
+a worthy role for striving, for engaging in methods, for growth and
+development; and at the same time recognizing that all these methods are
+fundamentally designed simply to bring to light what is already there, in all
+of its perfection, in all of its completeness. This is the pure fountain of
+loving-kindness and wisdom we are trying to cultivate.
+ The mantra OṂ MAṆI PADME HŪṂ is associated with Avalokiteśvara,
+the embodiment of enlightened compassion, and the mantra is the verbal
+articulation of that same quality of compassion. Among the many
+interpretations of the mantra, here is one I find especially meaningful. Oṃ
+signifies the manifest body, speech, and mind. Maṇi in Sanskrit means
+“jewel.” Padme, pronounced pémé in Tibetan, means “in the lotus.”
+Hūṃ, pronounced by the Tibetans as hoong, is a syllable suggestive of the
+deepest, essential, transcendent nature of consciousness. So the mantra
+starts out from the manifest state of the body, speech, and mind, then through
+the metaphor of the jewel in the lotus, goes to the depths of consciousness.
+ -- B. Alan Wallace, "The Four Immeasurables: Practices to Open the Heart",
+ published by Shambhala Publications
+~
+ In general, people tend to minimize the importance of the ordinary sangha:
+Buddha is a big deal, Dharma is a big deal, and Sangha is something to put up
+with. Yet it’s within the ordinary sangha, monastic or lay, that the
+roughest edges of our arrogance and pride can be smoothed down a little.
+Americans—with their car obsessions—have a good expression for this:
+“Where the rubber meets the road.” Let’s say there’s a shiny new car
+on the floor. It appears to be perfect. But we still need to take it for a
+test–drive. The car that never leaves the shop is like a practitioner
+reciting nice words about compassion and selflessness, but removed from the
+opportunity to test–drive their intentions and aspirations. How do the
+bodhisattva ideals hold up when we actually interact with others?
+ Problems within the sangha inevitably arise because we’re talking about
+unenlightened people trying to get along with each other. Jealousy,
+competition, and anger inevitably erupt. Although individual practitioners
+have unenlightened minds and commit unenlightened activities and get ensnared
+in ignorant understanding, the ordinary sangha still offers the best
+opportunity to apply dharma.
+ -- Yongey Mingyur Rinpoche, "Turning Confusion into Clarity", published by
+ Shambhala Publications
+~
+ Silly beings, uninterested in this meaning,
+ Are always carried away by the river of samsara and finished.
+
+There are some who do not have much faith in the dharmachakra of No Mental
+Activity, the essence-meaning of mahamudra. Here, Mahasiddha Tilopa does not
+mean all sentient beings in general but rather some who cling to tenet
+systems—those with attachment to their own system. There are quite a few
+such intellectual logicians. Such intransigent stubborn “silly ones” who
+lack the eye of wisdom
+ -- Sangyes Nyenpa, "Tilopa’s Mahamudra Upadesha", published by Shambhala
+ Publications